커리/릴라드/어빙 올시즌 수비2차 스탯 비교

네  진짜 아무런 선입관 없이 그냥 검색해본건데 

매니아분들 말씀이 맞네요.  그리고 

기록 안보고 그냥 경기 시청하면서 눈으로만 봐도

커리 수비가 릴라드랑 어빙 보다는 나아보이는거 같아요.. 

Like BPM and RPM, RAPTOR is a plus-minus statistic that measures the number of points a player contributes to his team’s offense and defense per 100 possessions, relative to a league-average player. For instance, a player with an offensive RAPTOR rating of +2.1 boosts his team’s performance by 2.1 points per 100 offensive possessions while he is on the floor. Likewise, a player with a defensive RAPTOR of +3.4 would improve his team’s defensive performance¹ by 3.4 points per 100 possessions while he’s on the cour

• Plus-minus statistics have certain inherent limitations, and RAPTOR is subject to those, too. Namely, these statistics assume that player performance is largely linear and additive, that is, that you can roughly add up the ratings from individual players to project team performance. In other words, RAPTOR does not account for coaching, systems or synergies between teammates.

• RAPTOR consists of two major components that are blended together to rate players: a “box” (as in “box score”) component, which uses individual statistics (including statistics derived from player tracking and play-by-play data), and an “on-off” component, which evaluates a team’s performance when the player and various combinations of his teammates are on or off the floor.
• The variables included in “box” RAPTOR were chosen by evaluating how they did in predicting long-term RAPM (real adjusted plus-minus), which is a measure of how a team’s performance changes when the player is on and off the floor. Essentially, this is the same technique that BPM used, only RAPTOR uses play-by-play and player tracking statistics in addition to traditional ones. On offense, for instance, in addition to using traditional statistics like points, RAPTOR accounts for factors such as how many of a player’s field goals were assisted and how valuable these assists were,² the value of different types of offensive rebounds, time of possession and various measures of floor spacing, such as the number of contested 3-pointers that the player took. On defense, it looks at factors like how often the player was the nearest defender on an opponents’ shot and how often those shots went in,³ how many points and rebounds were scored by opponents at the defender’s position, and how often the player induced offensive fouls.

• The “on-off” element of RAPTOR evaluates how a player’s team performed while he was on the floor, how the player’s courtmates (the teammates that the player most often shared the court with) performed while they were on the floor without the player, and, finally, how those courtmates’ other courtmates performed when they were on the floor without the player’s courtmates, all adjusted for the strength of competition they were facing. We know it might sound a little goofy. But it’s relatively simple to calculate. And it correlates very well with RAPM, while stabilizing a lot faster than RAPM, which can take years’ worth of data to estimate reliably.
• Overall, however, RAPTOR weights the “box” component more highly than the “on-off” component. In testing RAPTOR on out-of-sample data, we found that while on-court/off-court stats provide useful information, they’re nonetheless quite noisy as compared with individual measures of player value that are used in the “box” part of RAPTOR.

-----------

랩터스탯이 뭔지 잘 몰라서 검색해봤습니다. 

다만 올해 어빙은 평소보다 수비를 더 열심히 해서 커빙/릴영으로 굳이 나눌려면 나눠도 될 것 같습니다

디 르브론이란 이름의 2차스탯이 잇어요?  신기하네요 

랩터는 가끔 들어봤는데 이번 기회에 한번 검색해봤네요  

암튼 릴라드 이번 시즌 수비 진짜 못한다고 느꼇는데

기록으로 봐도 진짜 못하긴 하네요.